You can’t fix what only grace can repair.
On a sunny Saturday last year at Wimbledon, Centre Court had the pleasant buzz of a summer outing — the kind where spectators sip Pimm’s, nibble strawberries drowned in champagne, and pretend they are simply out for a gentle afternoon rather than watching world-class athletes battle nerves and destiny. Amanda Anisimova — young, immensely talented and having just played the match of her life, beating top-ranked Aryna Sabalenka in the semis — walked onto the court for the women’s final. It was her first Grand Slam final. Expectations were enormous. Commentators were already envisioning her name on the trophy. The buildup was perfect.
But the match wasn’t.
What unfolded was startling, painful and unforgettable. Anisimova didn’t just lose. She didn’t win a single game, dropping the final 6-0, 6-0 to Iga Swiatek on one of tennis’s most prestigious stages. She lost in front of the entire world, including the Princess of Wales, no less! In fact, this was the first time in over a century that a Wimbledon singles final ended with one player not winning a game, and only the second time in the Open Era that a women’s major final finished with a “double bagel” scoreline — a level of dominance virtually unseen in modern Grand Slam tennis. The match took just 57 minutes. She lost, a total failure to launch. The conventional wisdom was that her career was over.
And then came the moment people still talk about: the interview.
Standing there with tears in her eyes, voice shaking, the magnitude of the loss hanging visibly on her shoulders, she didn’t hide behind clichés or defensiveness. She didn’t blame the crowd, the pressure, the weather or nerves. She didn’t minimize what had just happened. Instead, she did something remarkably rare in elite sports — or in any arena of life.
She was honest.
“I’m devastated,” she said. “I’m disappointed in myself. I wanted to do better. And I’ll learn from this.” She talked about her mistakes without trying to spin them into excuses. She acknowledged her heartbreak without collapsing into self-pity. She was vulnerable without being defeated. And because she was vulnerable, she was strong.
One year later, few people remember what Swiatek had to say in accepting the Wimbledon trophy. But we remember what her vanquished opponent said. Observers across the sports world called it one of the most emotionally intelligent post-match interviews in years.
One voice in particular stood out: Amy Edmondson, an academic who studies failure. In her 2023 book, Right Kind of Wrong: The Science of Failing Well, she argues that thriving individuals and flourishing organizations are not the ones who never fail; they’re the ones who learn to fail well. She watched Anisimova’s interview and recognized what most people miss: the courage it takes to face your own shortcomings without excuses. The courage to name your mistakes honestly. The courage to acknowledge what went wrong yet still choose to grow.
“It was courageous,” Edmondson said. “It was honest, and then you realize how compelling it is and how few people truly take that opportunity to be honest and vulnerable after a devastating failure.”
That’s a rare thing. Most of us don’t want to be that honest with ourselves, much less in front of anyone else, because honesty means acknowledging the gap between the person we aspire to be and the person we are.
And yet Romans 7 — our text for today — is nothing but honesty.
It’s Paul, stripped of pretense, without excuses, without spin doctors or self-protection. And he says, “I do not understand my own actions. For I do not do what I want, but I do the very thing I hate” (v. 15). These are not the words of someone making excuses. They are the words of someone who has found the courage to tell the truth.
The Illusion of Control
We live in the golden age of self-improvement. There are podcasts promising to fix your bad habits. Books guaranteeing a “new you” in 30 days. Apps that claim they can reshape your mindset. Gyms that promise transformation. And influencers who swear that if you’ll just follow their morning routine, you’ll finally have everything together.
Some of these tools can be helpful. There’s nothing wrong with wanting to grow, mature or live wisely. But beneath it all is a quiet, unspoken assumption: that with just a little more effort, the right strategy, or one more life hack, you can finally conquer yourself.
But here is the question nobody asks out loud: Why are you the hardest person in your life to manage?
Why is it that you can change your schedule, your diet and your phone settings, but you can’t seem to change yourself? Why do we circle back to the same struggles year after year? Why does life feel like rinse, repeat, regret? Paul understands this with startling clarity. He says it plainly: “I do not understand my own actions” (v. 15).
Few verses in the Bible are as universally relatable as this one. Because every thoughtful, reflective person knows exactly what Paul means.
As we age and look back on our lives, we dwell on the times we:
Even those who have lived long, full lives of faith recognize that the inner battles don’t magically disappear with age. If anything, we grow more aware of them.
The Bankruptcy of Self-Help
Paul continues: “I do not do what I want, but I do the very thing I hate” (v. 15). He doesn’t deny that he wants to live a godly life, nor does he say that he is ignorant of right and wrong. He doesn’t deny that he understands what the law requires (Lord knows he has tried to do the right thing) or restrain himself from doing stupid, sinful things.
We are all familiar with Paul’s dilemma. We know better, but we don’t do better. We have all lived with that inner frustration, the gap between who we want to be and who we really are.
It’s easy to think we might get some sense as we age. But there’s an old Pennsylvania Dutch proverb that feels especially true the older we get: “Zu früh alt, zu spät schlau,” meaning “We get too soon old and too late smart.” In other words, by the time we figure out how to handle ourselves, we’ve already spent decades proving we can’t. Paul says exactly the same thing, only with better theology.
But better theology, knowledge or willpower isn’t enough. This isn’t Paul saying, “I’m failing.” This is Paul saying, “I cannot fix myself.” Make no mistake, Romans 7 is not the diary of a wimpy kid. It is the woeful confession of someone who has stopped pretending. Paul has hit the wall, the limits of self-help.
You can optimize your morning routine. You can drink more water. You can get more sleep, read more books, listen to more sermons, set more goals and attend more workshops.
But none of this can touch the deep fractures, disordered loves and habits of mind and heart that shape how you behave, respond and choose.
This isn’t to say we shouldn’t strive to be the best version of ourselves. But let’s get real. Self-help can only do so much. It can help you get organized, but it can’t heal what’s broken. It can help you be productive, but it can’t make you whole.
It’s a little like that famous song from Wicked, where Elphaba unleashes a full-throated, soaring voice that shakes the rafters, announcing her determination to “defy gravity.” It might be a great Broadway moment, but it’s not a great spiritual strategy. It’s thrilling on stage: the wires lift her, the music swells, but when the show is over, no one walks out of the theatre expecting to fly home. You can sing about defying gravity, but you’re not going to float off the ground. And, Paul says, neither can you defy the gravity of human nature by sheer willpower.
This is why the apostle identifies a surprising truth. “I see in my members another law at war with the law of my mind” (v. 23). Another gravity. Another pull. Another force. It’s not just sin out there. It’s sin in here.
No wonder he cries out, “Who will rescue me?” (v. 24). Notice he doesn’t ask, “What will deliver me?” Or what program, book, app, TV show, routine or technique will deliver him.
Paul knows that his problems are not going to be solved by things. It is going to be a Who, and in all honesty, he now understands and confesses that the Who ain’t him.
Honesty as the Doorway to Grace
One of the gifts of Romans 7 is that Paul refuses to clean himself up before speaking. He doesn’t present himself as the polished apostle who founded churches, endured shipwrecks and wrote half the New Testament. He gives us the version of himself he’d probably prefer to hide, the version who struggles, contradicts himself, wants what is right and somehow still does what is wrong. Paul isn’t being dramatic; he’s being truthful. And his truthfulness is the very place where grace begins to appear.
We sometimes imagine that God is impressed with our strength, discipline, competence or ability to get our act together. But Paul suggests something different. What moves God toward us isn’t our performance but our honesty. Pretending doesn’t attract God; honesty does. The person who finally says, “I can’t do this on my own,” discovers that grace was waiting for that admission all along. It’s like God is saying, “What took you so long?”
Paul reaches that moment in this chapter. After describing the tug-of-war inside himself, he runs out of explanations and strategies. He has tried willpower, knowledge and resolve. He has even tried the law itself. And none of it has been enough. There is a quiet desperation in his question, “Who will rescue me from this body of death?” (v. 24). It isn’t a request for another round of self-improvement. It is a confession that he needs someone outside himself to step in, someone who is stronger and wiser.
And then, almost as if the answer arrives in the very breath after the question, Paul says, “Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord” (v. 25). The shift is subtle but profound. Paul isn’t rescued because he finally figures himself out. He is rescued because he finally stops pretending he can. Grace is not God congratulating us for almost getting there. Grace is God meeting us at the place where we finally admit we can’t.
What Paul discovers is something many of us learn only after we have exhausted ourselves — that surrender is not the end of effort but the beginning of healing. When we stop managing our image, trying to outrun our flaws, or curating a version of ourselves we think God prefers, something profound happens. We experience a flood of mercy and grace. “Thanks be to God!”
The Set Continues, but the Match Is Decided
Romans 7 ends on a complicated note. Paul says, essentially, “I have two selves. One delights in God’s law. The other pulls me toward sin. And that battle continues.”
If we are honest, this is probably true for all of us. Being an earnest, committed believer doesn’t mean we aren’t going to face inner struggles and near-fatal doubts. The apostle Paul aside, just read the histories of such spiritual luminaries as Augustine and his struggles with sex and food; Martin Luther’s Anfechtung and “terrors of conscience”; Saint John of the Cross who introduced the phrase “dark night of the soul” into our spiritual lexicon; or C.S. Lewis who, after his wife Joy succumbed to cancer, admitted that his faith “was a house of cards.” There are many other examples. The inner struggle continues. But the battle itself is won! Or, we might say that the set continues, but the match is won! This is the good news. Being a person of faith doesn’t cause your struggles to disappear; rather, it reframes them. Another way of putting this is to say that Romans 7 is not the final word, but Romans 8 is.
So, in one sense, the set continues, but the match is decided.
This is good news for those who carry private burdens of conscience, memory or regret. Romans 7 tells you that God isn’t surprised by your humanity. God isn’t scandalized by your weakness. God doesn’t turn away from your struggle.
Instead, God’s grace meets you precisely where you are.
Returning to Wimbledon
Let’s return to Amanda Anisimova for a moment.
After that devastating 6–0, 6–0 loss at Wimbledon in her first Grand Slam final, she had every reason to hide, deflect or withdraw. But she didn’t. She chose honesty, vulnerability and truth-telling.
And what happened next?
She recovered, trained and grew. She returned to the court with humility and grit.
Within 60 days, she was playing in another major, and once again met the adversary who had humiliated her on Centre Court in front of the Princess of Wales and an astonished world. This time, she handily defeated Swiatek 6-4, 6-3, reaching her first U.S. Open semifinal and avenging the Wimbledon loss. She even went on to her second consecutive Grand Slam final, contesting fiercely before yielding to Aryna Sabalenka.
Failure was not the end. It was the beginning of something new.
She lost. She learned. She launched!
And this is the gospel truth of Romans 7:
Because, like Amanda standing on Centre Court, grace means we can be honest without being destroyed. You can’t fix what only grace can repair. This is why the God of grace meets us in our weakness and rescues us with mercy that doesn’t let us go.
Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord.
Amen.
—Timothy Merrill and Carl Wilton contributed to this material.
Sources
Dodd, Rustin. “Why Amanda Anisimova’s emotional post-match interview was a masterclass in handling failure.” The New York Times, nytimes.com, July 15, 2025. Retrieved December 18, 2025.
O’Brien, William R. “The blame game: Romans 7:15-25a.” The Christian Century, christiancentury.org, June 28, 2005. Retrieved December 18, 2025.
Tignor, Steve. “Amanda Anisimova avenges a double-bagel Wimbledon final loss to Iga Swiatek: ‘Today proved everything for me.’” Tennis.com, September 4, 2025. Retrieved December 18, 2025.
Genesis 24:34-38, 42-49, 58-67
What Is One Possible Approach to the Text?
The Backstage God. People who love theater do not necessarily love being on stage. What happens in view of the audience could not possibly happen without backstage help. There are many theater students who aspire to the backstage work on sound, lights, props, backdrops, sets, designs and so on. In this story, God, who has been on stage in so many of the stories in Genesis, suddenly goes backstage, and a humble and obedient servant takes over the stage. If the preacher is a storyteller, this is an ideal story to work with. Weave into the story what the life of faith looks like. Talk about how Eliezer prays and moves forward without any explicit direction from an onstage God.
What Does the Text Say?
Arranged marriages were common in the ancient Near East. Further, tribal peoples preferred that their offspring marry within their own clans. So, after Abraham’s wife Sarah died, he carefully instructed (Genesis 24:3-4, 37-38) his highly regarded servant to obtain a wife for their son Isaac. The wife was to come from close kinfolks in the area of Haran/Paddan-aram, along the Euphrates River in northwest Mesopotamia, rather than chancing that Isaac would marry one or more local Canaanite women. Abraham’s servant prayed that he would find just the right wife for Isaac. Rebekah (the daughter of Isaac’s first cousin, Bethuel) turned out to be the answer to his prayer. And after serious negotiations (including financial considerations) between Abraham’s servant and Rebekah’s father Bethuel and her brother Laban, she returned to Canaan with him to become Isaac’s wife, after her family had blessed her. Notice, however, that even with all the bartering, Rebekah was asked for her consent (v. 58). Isaac was quite pleased with Rebekah and loved her. An interesting side issue is that Abraham’s servant was told explicitly (vv. 5-8) not to take Isaac with him on a potential return journey to Paddan-aram. This is partly due to God wanting his people to continue to live in the promised setting of Canaan, and, reading between several of the Bible’s lines, Isaac was a relatively weak person compared to his father Abraham and his son Jacob. In terms of biblical theology, note two things:
Psalm 45:10-17
What Is One Possible Approach to the Text?
How Do I Love Thee? I Cannot Count the Ways. The title is a reference to E.B. Browning’s “Sonnet 43” (Sonnets from the Portuguese). The reference is intended to launch the sermon into a discussion of the relationship between the loved and the lover. Because, unless the preacher is willing to allegorize this text, we got nothin’. With that out of the way, refresh the congregation’s memory about Christ and the church by talking about the metaphor of a bride and groom. You can jump to Matthew 25 and the story about the wise and foolish bridesmaids. But the NT lifts up the metaphor of the church as the bride of Christ in a number of different places. Review this. Then assert that this psalm can be read in the same way. Explain the literal meaning and then point out a few highlights of your choosing that illustrate some crucial quality of the church in relation to the groom, Jesus Christ. For example, the church will “forget your people and your father’s house” (v. 10). In other words, the church will forsake its former life and embrace its new one. The church will “bow to him,” since “he is your lord” (v. 11). (You could also use this psalm to teach about the principles of seeing some texts in the OT through a Messianic lens.)
What Does the Text Say?
When Christians read the OT, they often read it with trifocals. The larger, literal lens surveys the OT and understands each text in its specific historical milieu. In this case, the NRSV announces that the psalm is an “Ode to a Royal Wedding.” In verses 2-9, the groom is depicted, and in verses 10-17, the bride. Literally, the groom is an unnamed prince or king of Israel, and the bride — his bride — a princess who bows to her lord, the king, her husband. It’s possible that this psalm was a traditional reading or song in such ceremonies. The two smaller lenses are interpretive prisms that make sense out of this for later generations. The first of these understands the king of verses 2-9 to be God, and the virgin princess/bride of verses 10-17 to be Israel. The final lens through which Christians peer shows this song to be not just about a king and his bride, or God and Israel, but about Christ and the church.
Matthew 11:16-19, 25-30
What Is One Possible Approach to the Text?
The Yoke Is on Me. Discuss for a few moments the different ways we might enjoy taking a break, taking a load off, chillaxing, stepping back, tuning out or taking it slow and easy. How would that happen? Eighteen holes of golf? A drink at the corner pub? A massage? A weekend trip to the mountains or ocean? Headphones and music? Show slides of options, perhaps. When you have covered the options and perhaps solicited suggestions from the congregation, roll out an actual yoke, or at the very least show a slide of one. It’s possible that many people in your urban congregation will have no idea what a yoke is. Then explain that Jesus says, “Take my yoke upon you … and you will find rest for your souls.” Explain how that is true. The final three verses provide the preacher with the easiest homiletical path. Although the Law offers rest on the Sabbath, Jesus offers a new rest for those who are burdened and weary from trying to keep the demands of the Law. When we “come unto” Jesus, we find rest, even though Jesus, too, invites us to take a yoke. In this case, however, shouldering that yoke beside us is none other than Jesus himself.
What Does the Text Say?
Fortunately for the preacher, this gospel reading includes the well-known “Great Invitation” found in verses 28-30. If it did not, this pericope, its standing as a gospel lection notwithstanding, might never get preached. The reading begins with Jesus’ cryptic and unflattering allusion to the games children play — but elsewhere Jesus says that unless you become as a child, you cannot enter the kingdom of heaven. He then complains that critics say that his cousin John is too strict, but that Jesus himself is too freewheeling. In the RCL elliptical reading, Jesus goes on to pronounce a couple of woes on some nearby cities. He then gives thanks that “these things” have been hidden from the so-called intelligentsia but revealed to “infants.”
May all your days know God’s surprising grace, Christ’s incredible peace, and the Spirit’s unquenchable joy.
Leader: We gather as a community of faith, even though sometimes we falter.
Voice 1: God, I admit I wanted to ignore the alarm and go back to sleep.
Voice 2: How tempted I was to stay home.
Voice 3: O God, I wanted so much to watch the game live.
All: Yet here we are, a community of faith, seeking strength to live out our lives courageously, faithfully and triumphantly as we strive to follow Jesus.
Leader: My friends, despite your temptations, you still come.
All: Let us then gather our hearts and our voices together as we lift our praise to God who strengthens us and supports us in all that we do.
Creator God, maker of dancing stars and awesome rainbows, sender of gentle breezes and swirling winds, finder of lost chances and mender of broken dreams, you bless us with beauty, and you grace us with understanding. You know us inside and out. When the heart sighs with grief too large to carry, you are there. When tears flow like an angry stream, you are there. When doubt snares us like a trap, you are there. When hope dwindles to a thin strand, you are there.
You know our comings and goings. You know when we succeed and when we fail. You know the deepest longings of our hearts. Through it all, your love surrounds us, embraces us and sustains us. In the stillness of this moment, let us abide with Christ in your love. Amen.
Hymns
Approach, My Soul, the Mercy Seat
When We Are Tempted to Deny Your Son
God of Grace and God of Glory
Worship and Praise*
Lead Me to the Cross (Fraser)
Run to the Father (Maher, Carnes, Jackson)
Broken Vessels (Amazing Grace) (Houston, Myrin)
*For licensing and permission to reprint or display these songs on screen, go to ccli.com. The worship and praise songs suggested by Homiletics can be found in most cases on Google by using the title as the search term.
on Romans 7:15-25a
Romans 7:15-25a is part of a six-part discussion from the letter’s first eight chapters in which Paul juxtaposes the old life under the power of sin with the new life in the power of the Spirit. The way out from the old life into the new is beyond human achievement, emerging solely from God’s grace operating in the reconciling activity of Christ. Crucial to Paul’s clarification of the movement toward life in the Spirit is his determination to proclaim the gospel as “God’s saving power for everyone who believes, for the Jew first and also for the Greek” (1:16).
Romans 1:18-3:20 demonstrates the universal need of salvation due to the sinful condition of all humankind — Jews (even as observers of the law) and Gentiles alike. Romans 3:21-4:25 focuses on God’s gracious gift of redemption in Christ that is “effective through faith” (3:25) and justifies “the circumcised on the ground of faith and the uncircumcised through that same faith” (3:30). Here, Paul highlights Abraham’s pre-circumcision trust in God’s promise, making the patriarch the faith ancestor of all regardless of circumcision. Abraham is Paul’s primary example for stating the case that we receive the promises of God — including salvation — not through any human effort but through faith.
Romans 5 underscores that the source of the salvation we receive through faith is none other than the reconciling activity of Christ. Romans 6 quickly dispels any speculation that we should sin in order to prompt God’s grace. Paul emphasizes that salvation means freedom to participate more fully in the new life of sanctification, urging his audience, “present yourselves to God as those who have been brought from death to life, and present your members to God as instruments of righteousness” (6:13).
Turning specifically to Romans 7:15-25a, we find that Paul has just finished putting the law into perspective compared to God’s free gift of eternal life in Christ (7:1-14). At best, the law is a spiritual warning system by which sin becomes recognizable for what it is (7:7, 12-13). At worst (and all too often), however, being made aware of sin by the law leads us to sin, not away from it (7:8-11, 13-14). As J. Christiaan Beker puts it, the law “compels sin to show its true face,” the law “detects sin and makes me aware of my desperate plight,” and, sadly, “this knowledge is not therapeutic or preventive but a knowledge-unto-death, which seals my doom” (Paul the Apostle [Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1980] 238-239).
Thus, Romans 7:15-25a opens with the understanding that humankind is ill-equipped to make effective use of the holiness of the law (7:11) that alerts us to sin. The trouble is that the warning system is in fleshly hands, which results in the irony that our observation of the law leads us into an existential dilemma instead of eternal life. Romans 7:15-23 delves into this dilemma full bore as Paul takes “a standard topos of the ancient world — the conflict between knowing what is [the] right thing to do and being incapable of finding the moral capacity to do it.” Here, the apostle highlights “the gulf between willing and [non] achievement” as well as “the grip of sin as indwelling power” (Byrne, Romans. Sacra Pagina 6. [Collegeville, Minn.: The Liturgical Press, 1996] 226). Corresponding to this is Beverly Gaventa’s observation that “Paul has in view here the religious person, the responsible member of the human community, the one who wants to be a contributing member of society. Despite every attempt to accomplish good for other and for self, the efforts of the religious person come to nothing” (Texts for Preaching: [Louisville, Ky.: Westminster John Knox, 1995] 393). The result is despair — “Wretched person that I am! Who will rescue me from this body of death?” (7:24). Yet the answer is immediate — “Thanks be to God through Jesus Christ our Lord!” (7:25a).
By underscoring the eventual failure of our fleshly human attempts to employ the law against sin, Paul points us to the only way out — Christ Jesus and, as will soon be elaborated in Romans 8, the law of the Spirit of life in Christ. Because we cannot handle the warning system of the law, we fall prey to the deadly futility of sin. Only Christ can successfully handle this sin, overcoming it and setting us free for fruitful life in the Spirit. By the end of Romans 7:15-25a, Paul reaches a conclusion that coincides with Paul Achtemeier’s appraisal of the apostle’s post-conversion “shift from thinking that one could uphold a right relationship with God by fulfilling the law to an understanding that only by trusting in God can one’s relationship to God be rectified, even if one does fulfill the law … Christ, not the law, is the way to a right relationship with God” (Achtemeier, Romans [Atlanta: John Knox, 1985] 128-129).
Attention to particular words in this passage yields reinforcing imagery for the preacher. For instance, Paul’s use of “flesh” (sarki, 7:18) denotes “human existence as weak, self-centered and hostile to God” and stands in opposition to the ways of the Spirit (Byrne 1996, 227). “Members” (melesin, 7:23) literally means “limbs” and can also refer to the organs as well as the overall frame of the body — all of which coincide metaphorically with the outward mobility, inner motivation and stature associated with human action. The frequent use of the verb “to do” comes from three separate Greek verbs used interchangeably:
This helps expand the nuances of meaning connected with the futility of observing the law. Perhaps most interesting is how the word “law” is used both in the specific sense of Torah in 7:16 and 22, and in the more general sense of a controlling force or power in 7:21 and 23 (Byrne, 231). This distinction can help clarify the rapid repetition with which “law” occurs in 7:17-23.
Finally, it is debated whether Romans 7:15-25a is an autobiographical confession of Paul’s personal sin or an anthropological construct of the sinful condition of humankind. Most likely both of these assessments are true and complementary. Whatever the case may be, scholars in the line of Krister Stendahl make a strong case that Paul does not labor under a guilty conscience so much as he confidently defines the personal and communal stakes concerning what and in whom we ultimately place our deepest trust. Paul knows the warning system of the law eventually finds us looking for how we can save the day. So, he points us in the direction not only of knowing we have to look for and find a savior but also knowing that our true Savior finds us before we ever look. Life under the law does not lead to life in the Spirit.
Only the reconciling activity of Christ moves us personally and communally toward new life in the power of the Spirit, often without warning. Of this, Paul is certain.
AT A GLANCE
Amanda Anisimova stood on Centre Court in Wimbledon with tears in her eyes, voice trembling, as the reality of her loss set in. She didn’t blame external factors or downplay what had just happened. Instead, she did something unexpected: she was honest. And it sounded like the apostle Paul in Romans 7, who reveals the best way to move on from a colossal failure.
RELATED TITLES IN THIS TOPIC
GRACE
SPORTS
TEMPTATION
ANIMATING ILLUSTRATIONS
Most Americans know the legend of Johnny Appleseed. In school — and via a famous Disney cartoon — we learned that he wandered barefoot through the western territories in America’s pioneer days, scattering apple seeds to grow trees in the wilderness that would feed unknown strangers, all while singing hymns of praise and trusting that the Lord would provide for him as well. Behind the legend was a real person named John Chapman, who lived from 1774 to 1845 and really did spend his adult life planting apple trees.
By contemporary accounts, Chapman was a true eccentric: “He went bare-footed, and often travelled miles through the snow in that way,” and he “wore on his head a tin utensil which answered both as a cap and a mush pot.” He was, in fact, a Swedenborgian — a member of the mystical sect founded by the 18th-century scientist and spiritualist Emanuel Swedenborg to restore the “internal sense” of Christian Scripture.
Because of his carefree lifestyle and esoteric spirituality, Chapman is usually characterized as a manifester — that is, an adherent to the doctrine that if you hold positive beliefs, a higher power will make them come true. This was a common belief in Chapman’s time, originating with mystics and faith healers who taught that positive thoughts create health and happiness.
To this day, this trust is a peculiarly American trait. Dozens of books are published each year on manifestation and the related concept of the law of attraction, which maintains that you draw into yourself what you choose to focus on. No wonder that the crude, instrumental form of this notion has plenty of believers: If you want to make a lot of money, just imagine yourself rich and act as if you already are — the universe will deliver. …
I got to wondering whether the Johnny Appleseed character really was a deluded manifester trying to will future bliss into existence or whether there was more to him than that. It turns out that he was actually just an old-fashioned, hard-working entrepreneur — albeit an oddball who liked to go barefoot, sleep outdoors, and wear a saucepan on his head.
Chapman’s Swedenborgian beliefs were quite esoteric, but the man behind them, Swedenborg himself, was eminently practical. “Everyone can know that willing and not doing, when there is opportunity, is not willing,” he wrote in his 1758 book Heaven and Hell; “also that loving and not doing good, when there is opportunity, is not loving.” This is the kind of manifestation that works and that animated Chapman. He didn’t scatter apple seeds aimlessly, but bought land, little by little, and cultivated nursery orchards in areas of growing population in the western territories. Over many decades, Chapman rose from poverty to wealth, leaving more than 1,200 acres of valuable nurseries to his heirs, all while creating a reliable supply of fruit and cider for the settlers. By all accounts, he died a happy man, beloved by those who knew him and feasted on his apples.
That was his manifestation: The true story — not the myth — is the one you can emulate to manifest the life you want.
—Arthur C. Brooks, “How to Be Manifestly Happier,” The Atlantic, September 5, 2024.
https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/09/manifestation-positive-thinking-happiness/679695/.
Retrieved February 5, 2026.
In the world of Christian clichés, the phrase “God helps those who help themselves” holds a peculiar place. It is often tossed around as a nugget of biblical wisdom, a spiritual endorsement of self-reliance, and a divine pat on the back for the industrious. However, this well-worn saying is not only absent from the Bible but fundamentally contradicts the core messages of Scripture. …
“God helps those who help themselves” … can be traced back to ancient Greece, notably appearing in Aesop’s fables. The phrase was popularized in the English-speaking world largely due to Benjamin Franklin, who included it in his Poor Richard’s Almanack. …
The ethos of the Bible leans heavily toward divine grace, mercy, and providence — themes that run counter to the idea of self-sufficiency. Scripture is replete with examples and teachings that emphasize God’s intervention on behalf of the powerless, the needy, and those unable to help themselves. …
Christianity, at its heart, is about embodying the love and grace of Christ, reaching out to those in need, and building communities founded on mutual aid and compassion. The real scriptural mandate is not about helping oneself but about serving others as a reflection of God’s love. …
It’s time to retire “God helps those who help themselves” from our spiritual vocabulary.
—Stuart Delony, “Divine DIY: Debunking The Myth Of Spiritual Self-Service,” Patheos.com, May 14, 2024.
https://www.patheos.com/blogs/snarkyfaith/2024/05/divine-diy-debunking-the-myth-of-spiritual-self-service/.
Retrieved February 5, 2026.
I’ve often heard this walking on water story from Matthew preached as like The Little Disciple Who Almost Could.
Like Peter could have kept walking on water if he just thought “I think I can, I think I can” enough. The message being that with enough faith you too can walk on water all the way to Jesus. Which, on the surface, sounds inspiring.
But taken to its logical conclusion, it also means that if you are not God-like in your ability to overcome all your fears and failings as a human … if you are not God-like in your ability to defy the forces of nature then the problem isn’t the limits of human potential, the problem is the limits of your faith and you should probably muster up some more.
I guess I’ve just never heard that way of telling the story as good news. Because for me, all the “I think I can, I think I can” in the world doesn’t make the storms of life any less terrifying. All the power of positive thinking and high self-esteem on the planet doesn’t seem to do the trick to make me less afraid when the dangers of life surround me. …
So if you are wondering what it looks like to have faith, know this: Faith isn’t you doing the impossible — it’s remembering that God can and has and will again do the impossible.
And to have faith is to know that God is God and we don’t have to be.
—Nadia Bolz-Weber, “The Case Against WWJD Bracelets,” Substack.com, August 13, 2023.
https://thecorners.substack.com/p/the-case-against-wwjd-bracelets.
Retrieved February 5, 2026.
If you want self-help, why would you read a book written by someone else? That is not self-help, that’s help!
—George Carlin
I am self-made. Didn’t anyone tell you? I brought myself into the world when I decided to be born on a bright Monday morning. Then I figured out how cells replicate to grow my own arms and legs and head to a reasonable height and size. Then I filled my own mind from kindergarten to graduation with information I gleaned from the great works of literature.
I’m joking, but sometimes it feels like the pressure we are under. An entire self-help and wellness industry made sure that we got the memo: we are supposed to articulate our lives as a solitary story of realization and progress. Work. Learn. Fix. Change. Every exciting action sounds like it is designed for an individual who needs to learn how to conquer a world of their own making.
It’s hard to remember a deeper, comforting truth: we are built on a foundation not our own. We were born because two other people created a combination of biological matter. We went to schools where dozens and dozens of people crafted ideas and activities to construct categories in our minds. We learned skills honed by generations of craftspeople. We pray and worship with spiritual ideas refined by centuries of tradition. Almost nothing about us is original. Thank God.
It reminds me of the account of creation in Genesis. God breathes oxygen into lungs in an instance of divine CPR. I love picturing that God, the only One who can create out of nothing — ex nihilo. God, who set the cornerstone of our lives and our faith, laid the first brick. The Master Builder whose carefully poured foundation is what we build on top of now. It certainly feels like a template for the rest of our experience.
—Kate Bowler and Jessica Richie, Good Enough: 40ish Devotionals for a Life of Imperfection (New York: Convergent Books, 2022), 51–53.
CHILDREN'S SERMON
Ask the children if they have ever been to a county fair or amusement park. What did they see? Did any of the kids go into a “fun house”? Talk about fun houses, especially the funny mirrors. Sometimes the mirrors are located in a maze you walk through. What are the mirrors like? They are not like the ones we see at home. The mirrors in the fun house make us look short and fat or tall and skinny. Of course, these mirrors do not reflect what we really look like. Hold up a mirror and tell them when we look into a real mirror, we see reflections of how we really look. Now hold up a Bible. This is God’s mirror, because it shows whether we are kind and loving or mean and unkind. The Bible not only shows us what we look like in the eyes of God and the people around us, but it helps us to clean up and look pretty on the inside. And if we’re good-looking and pretty on the inside, we will look a lot better on the outside, too. Close in prayer: “O God, thank you for giving us your mirror to show us what we look like. Help us to look really good inside. Amen.”
Alternative Idea: Face Distortion Apps
Use a face distortion app on your smartphone or tablet. Let one or two of the kids take a photo of you and distort your face. Explain that the distorted image isn’t what you really look like and then compare it with an untouched photo. Show the kids your Bible and explain that it shows us just as we really are. It shows us that when we’re mean and unkind, our “inside” face doesn’t look so good.
Start today. Cancel any time.
Act now and, for just $7.99 a month or $84.95 a year, you’ll receive a full year of this valuable sermon preparation resource.
Our convenient, continuous-subscription program ensures you'll never miss out on the inspiration you need, when you need it.
You’re never obligated to continue. Naturally, you may cancel at any time for any reason, no questions asked.