You’ve no doubt seen the commercial in which the farmer,
in his corral, is wiping his brow in disbelief. There, milling about
looking for feed, are 200 dachshunds. As though reading his mind,
Sprint’s version of Neo appears — a trench-coated specialist
who looks like he’s been sprung from the Matrix — and
tells the rancher that the problem may be his cell phone.
“What did you say?” he asks.
“I ordered 200 oxen and got 200 dachshunds!”
“Umm. Static,” says Neo. A dachshund stampede ensues.
Verizon Wireless, competing for cell phone dollars, is also tapping
in on our need not only to be heard, but to be understood. A Gen-X,
Keanu Reeves look-alike prowls around in assorted locales —
the beach, the street, a mall — and asks, “Can you hear
me now? Gooood!”
Of course, the question is moot if you don’t have a phone.
One factoid that frequently surfaces in high-level economic and
social forums is the notion that “half the world has never
made a phone call.” The assertion was made by former Vice
President Al Gore in 1998, repeated by HP’s Carla Fiorina
in 2001, and by a number of other leading business and political
figures.
But it’s not true, even though it was once true. Clay Sirky
of New York University’s graduate Interactive Telecommunications
Program makes a persuasive case in Wired: By 2001, more than a billion
land lines had been laid throughout the world, and the rate of growth
in lines laid was greatest in the developing world. In six years
China went from 41 million to 179 million; more than 40 other Third
World nations doubled their land lines in the last six years of
the millennium.
These figures pale to the growth in cell phone sales. The number
of mobile phones went from 91 million in 1995 to 986 million in
2001, and the number continues to grow.
The words of a popular advertising campaign, “Understand
me, unleash me, uber me,” have become the mantra of the masses.
Never has being in tune been so urgent, and out of tune been so
common.
This should be instructive for the church. It’s popular
in some circles to argue that more than half the people of the world
have never heard the gospel. It’s likely not true. We’ve
heard, but not understood.
The people of the “post” world we live in —
postmodern, post-Christian, post-feminist and so on — are
fed up with static and interference. When you live post-9/11, when
you’re still waiting for your dividend check from WorldCom,
when you’re trying to develop your personal plotline for life,
when you’re desperately looking for a container for your joy,
when you’re living with wars and rumors of war, you’d
like someone — anyone — to pick up the white courtesy
telephone and make a small connection that validates you, affirms
you and gives you hope.
Yet it is arguable whether the good news is getting a hearing.
Tony Campolo, America’s uberprophet and critic, invited to
speak to the National Council of Churches to address the question
of how mainliners can better understand evangelicals, told them
that he had read through their “platform” and approved
of most of it. But then he added something to the effect: “I’ve
got to tell you: This looks a lot like the Democratic Party platform.
What I am interested in is how your theology supports your positions.”
Evangelicals don’t do much better in the popular culture.
George Barna Research recently released a poll in which people were
asked to rank 12 groups in terms of their “favorability.”
Evangelicals as a group came in next to last, right behind lesbians,
but ahead of prostitutes. Oops! If evangelicals are asking, “Can
you hear me now?” the answer clearly is “No!”
What to do: We need to remember that the church is about relationships
not locationships. Pool reporters during the 2000 presidential campaign
teased Alexandra Pelosi who was filming a documentary of George
Bush that would later air as an HBO special called Journeys with
George,”about her locationship with a certain Newsweek reporter.
When you’re both flying around the country 24/7, you can only
hope for periodic locationships — not anything that can develop
into something more meaningful. The church is in love with location.
If we stay in one place we’re apt to be unheard or misunderstood
by the audience we’re trying to reach. We love nothing better
than to erect buildings and develop sprawling ecclesial campuses.
The church is not about locationships: It’s about vocationships
and relationships. Christianity is at its core an itinerant and
a relational gospel. Jesus walked and talked — “Can
you hear me now?” — and the early church did its evangelizing
in the marketplace.
New millennium ministry is also about clarity not noise. Interference,
static, noise — it all affects the transmission of the message.
We are facing today unparalleled challenges with cultural, generational,
gender and ethnic noise that require new skills to communicate the
good news. Sometimes, we’re not even speaking a language people
understand. We may have lost sight of the essential mission of the
church by confusing the prophetic ministry of the church with the
political agenda of national parties. A preacher grinding a prophetic
axe in the pulpit often sounds like a politician wielding the axe
to someone in the pew — because for many, the only difference
between a preacher and a politician is a well-chosen Bible verse,
and the result is litmus-test Christianity.
Finally, the church in 21C is about speed not stasis. The lifespan
of a typical church is about 70 years. Churches that die have failed
to pass on to succeeding generations the core values that enabled
it to enjoy early vitality. When you’re a 28K modem church
in a cable modem world, you’ll soon be irrelevant.
Research shows that 80 percent of the nation’s Protestant
churches are either in decline or have leveled out. After 10 years,
most new-start churches are not much over the 100-member level they
realized initially. Only a few of these dead or dying churches will
become “turnaround” churches — churches that redefine
their mission and their methods to fulfill it.
“Go into all the world and make disciples,” Jesus
said. We may be doing that, but we should be asking, “Can
you hear me now?”