An old joke bears repeating: Two men are walking in the woods
when they come across a bear. The first man reaches into his knapsack
and pulls out a pair of sneakers.
“Why are you putting on sneakers?” asks the second
man. “You can’t outrun a bear.”
“I don’t have to outrun a bear,” said the first,
“I just have to outrun you.” No lack of moral clarity
here: If one of us is going to be eaten by a bear, it’s better
you than me, thinks the first fellow.
If we were to add an epilogue to this story in which the first
man trips and falls in his haste to outrun the other and thus becomes
the bear’s victim, there’s a strong chance that we,
along with the second fellow would feel what the Germans call Schadenfreude
- joy at someone else’s misfortune. Arrogant jerk. He got
what he deserved.
Malicious joy. It’s an emotion as old as the human race
itself. The Old Testament reeks of it. At the Red Sea, the Egyptian
army is still warm in its watery grave when Moses and Miriam, tambourines
in hand, lead a mocking dance and sing a song about how the Egyptians
sank like lead in the mighty waters. The psalmist, aching for Schadenfreude,
complains about the prosperity of the wicked while he feels like
a pelican in the wilderness. Habakkuk marvels at the Chaldeans who
deride, scoff and laugh, yet God remains silent and unresponsive
while “the wicked swallow up those more righteous than themselves.”
Not much has changed. Experiencing joy at another’s misfortune
has become the American pastime; it’s our favorite guilty
pleasure. In the post-9/11 hysteria of last year, we staggered in
a delirium of revenge. We had already seen the video footage of
Palestinians cheering the destruction of the World Trade Towers.
In Brooklyn, one young man emerged from a sea of people to climb
atop an old Buick station wagon and thrust his fist into the air.
He challenged Bin Laden to bring it on, and promised that when he
did, he would personally kick some ___ [rhymes with grass].
In the post-Enron months, justifiable Schadenfreude was the emotion
du jour. There’s no denying that we watched with some satisfaction
as Adelphia CEO John Rigasso, his two sons and others were pulled
down off their corporate perches and marched off to the local hoosegow
in handcuffs.
Not even Martha Stewart is immune. As America’s doyenne
of domesticity padded her portfolio, making millions by staying
true to her motto, “Just Have More,” even Homiletics
took a swipe at her (see “Regis and Jesus,” Homiletics,
March 19, 2000). Then, when she appeared to have profited from insider
information on Wall Street, and as the feds tightened the noose,
those who grumbled at her dumb luck now cheered at her misfortune.
As Alessandra Stanley and Constance Hays twittered in The New York
Times, the emotion was a blond variation of evil joy:
Blondenfreude - the joy of watching blonds screw up. In the late
‘90s, Republicans could scarcely muffle their delight at the
self-destructive shenanigans going on in the Oral Office. Democrats
clucked at the marital misfortunes of Newt Gingrich and Bob Livingston
and others. Even the church got involved. Liberals chortled at every
new Falwell gaffe, at published reports of this or that evangelical
calling Mohammed evil, devilish and a terrorist to boot, and scoffed
when Southern Baptists reaffirmed the subordinate role of the wife
in the home. On the other hand, the glee among evangelicals was
palpable when it was revealed that Jesse Jackson had a child of
an extramarital affair and was supporting the child and his mother.
In Chicago this summer, a father and son tag team jumped the railing
at a White Sox-Royals game to pummel the Royals’ first base
coach, Tom Gamboa. Later, in custody, the attackers spoke: “He
got what he deserved,” said a bare-chested Dumb with Dumber
standing at his side. Most of the crowd, not to mention those watching
on television during subsequent replays, were disappointed that
security acted as quickly as they did to pull the counterattacking
Royals and White Sox off these two Neanderthals.
Now the country’s gearing up for war, and by the time you
read this it may already be on. What we don’t realize and
don’t talk about is that this war is all about Schadenfreude.
We haven’t got any lately - not since we knocked off the Taliban
in Afghanistan. We need Schadenfreude. We’re hooked on it.
It’s a part of our psychological makeup. We feed on it. It’s
why President George Habakkuk Bush, relying on information from
his advisers in the U.S. Department of Schadenfreude, wants to go
after this Chaldean. After all, he noted, “He tried to kill
my dad.” Most Americans would like nothing better than to
see Stone-cold Saddam body-slammed to the mat with an American heel
at his throat. The war may be a just cause. Perhaps not. But in
any case, we cannot have a just and joyous war. There can be no
joy in launching missiles or in dropping bombs that take human life.
We can only hope that many more lives will - by our actions - be
saved. But war is no time for Schadenfreude, Saddamenfreude, or
any kind of freude.